Activity

SANNINE-MZAAR-FAKRA-BAKISH 030917

Download

Trail photos

Photo ofSANNINE-MZAAR-FAKRA-BAKISH 030917 Photo ofSANNINE-MZAAR-FAKRA-BAKISH 030917 Photo ofSANNINE-MZAAR-FAKRA-BAKISH 030917

Author

Trail stats

Distance
11.12 mi
Elevation gain
4,006 ft
Technical difficulty
Moderate
Elevation loss
4,006 ft
Max elevation
8,334 ft
TrailRank 
43 4.7
Min elevation
5,433 ft
Trail type
Loop
Time
7 hours 57 minutes
Coordinates
2088
Uploaded
September 3, 2017
Recorded
September 2017
  • Rating

  •   4.7 1 review
Share

near Sannîne, Mont-Liban (Lebanon)

Viewed 1507 times, downloaded 56 times

Trail photos

Photo ofSANNINE-MZAAR-FAKRA-BAKISH 030917 Photo ofSANNINE-MZAAR-FAKRA-BAKISH 030917 Photo ofSANNINE-MZAAR-FAKRA-BAKISH 030917

Itinerary description

Beautiful hike done on a sunny day. Starting near "Sannine fountain" to Sannine cross (around 850 m ascent in 3 km). From Sannine cross, we followed the 4x4 trail till Mzaar. Do not go Off-trail from Sannine to Mzaar because this part is not fully cleared from mines! Just before the final ascent to Mzaar, we went left to visit "St Charbel Statue" and Mzaar cross before going down to Mzaar. From Mzaar, we followed the classical "ligne des cretes" towards Fakra. At some point, we went down towards a trail going from Fakra to Bakish. After the "Bakish plateau" cross, we went down on different dirty trails to reach our starting point .

Waypoints

PictographWaypoint Altitude 6,247 ft

BAKISH

PictographWaypoint Altitude 6,385 ft

BERLAND ROUTE

PictographWaypoint Altitude 8,014 ft

CROSS & ST CHARBEL STATUE

PictographWaypoint Altitude 7,284 ft

LIGNE DES CRETES FAQRA-MZAAR

PictographWaypoint Altitude 7,999 ft

MZAAR CHURCH

PictographWaypoint Altitude 8,084 ft

MZAAR CROSS

PictographWaypoint Altitude 7,314 ft

PLATEAU

PictographWaypoint Altitude 8,329 ft

SANNINE CROSS

PictographFountain Altitude 5,711 ft

SANNINE FOUNTAIN

Comments  (9)

  • Photo of Christian Holzl
    Christian Holzl Oct 2, 2017

    PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE DOING THIS HIKE

    Hello Rami,
    Really a great hike, thank you.
    There is nevertheless a point I want to clarify: From the little black Statue of Mar Charbel to Mzar, you lead us 300m through the landmine area that is clearly marked (at the end) by collapsed metallic fences.
    Nothing happened, but to my opinion we should absolutely avoid this area.
    I recommend to avoid the black Mar Charbel statue, and directly go the Mzar from by the perpendicular road on the northern slope. Sorry Mar Charbel, and thanks for having protected us.
    No worries Rami, thanks for your hike.
    Best
    Christian


  • Photo of zahi.ramadan
    zahi.ramadan Oct 2, 2017

    Yes, it was a great hike. The mines issue was a bit problematic.
    Regards

  • Photo of Rami Rachkidi
    Rami Rachkidi Oct 2, 2017

    Hello guys! I am sorry for the inconvenience you had but i want to clarify the "mines" problem. I know that the area from sannine to mzaar is not cleared from mines and i mentioned this in my review but when i was doing the trail and before taking the normal north trail to Mzaar summit, i met a couple of guys (from kfardebian) coming down from 'st charbel' statue side (they did jonction-mzaar cross-st charbel little statue). I asked them if it's safe to do it, they confirmed that this part was recently cleared after the installation of the statue (?). This is the reason i took this part of the trail. I cant be sure they are saying the truth but i have to ask the lebanese army, the only reliable source of information.
    I would like to thank you for following my trail and for clarifying this part of the route. I never mean to "lead" anyone to "dangerous" areas!! Posting some of my trails on wikiloc takes lot of time and effort but i'm glad to share my adventures with the outdoor community.

  • Photo of Christian Holzl
    Christian Holzl Oct 3, 2017

    Hi Rami,

    No problem, I do understand your point. The track we talk about is only 300m and very close to the border of the zone. But nevertheless inside.

    The problem lies rather in the concept of Wikiloc. It is basically too simple to publish. Record, stop, publish, done.
    Zahi did the same error and I almost did.

    The issue is that the more we publish the more we encourage others to do the same. Until "boom".
    And even then the tracks stay available to the public.

    Wikiloc should implement a function "dangerous zones" where we could draw and discuss them .
    I addressed this issue on the Wikiloc forum. But as usual these hi-tech companies seem not to care much about feedback.

    Best regards

    Christian

  • Photo of Rami Rachkidi
    Rami Rachkidi Oct 3, 2017

    Dear Christian,

    Wikiloc is FREE and this is the best thing about it! I am sure that lot of people around the world are doing more outdoor activities because of this amazing community. You can not "force" a free service to give you 100% exact info!

    Some of those who are publishing on Wikiloc (including me) are doing it just because they are outdoor enthusiasts and they want to share their experiences with other outdoor lovers! It is not about publishing more! Who is getting anything from publishing here? It's not a record, stop and publish thing like you said , it's about sharing some of the adventures we actually did! We are asking nobody to follow our trails here!

    When i follow a trail i don't know on Wikiloc, i don't follow it " blindly" and i follow it AT MY OWN RISK! I can clarify some info about it later but i can never blame the one who posted it (for free)!! (I would never tell him you lead me through a dangerous area for example!)
    If someone is not satisfied with the "normal" flaws of wikiloc, he can simply "find" the trails himself or pay a certified old guide to hike "safely"!

    Best regards,
    Rami

  • Photo of Christian Holzl
    Christian Holzl Oct 4, 2017

    Dear Rami,

    The community is the tip of the iceberg. Wikiloc is a multi-million company.
    We enter the tracks. They consolidate the information and sell it.
    We are working for them. For free.

    Nevertheless, all in all this is a good system:
    The community enjoys the tracks.
    Wikiloc makes money out of it.

    But:
    What about avalanche zones, contaminated areas, minefields, shooting fields, etc?
    The system makes us act in a certain way. We follow others tracks. Most of us blindly. And we republish.
    Wikiloc facilitates this behavior. They push for it, this is their business: The more we publish the better they sell.
    And this implies a partial responsibility of Wikiloc in case of accident in dangerous zones.
    Unless:

    Proposed solution:
    Wikiloc should provide a function where users can draw the dangerous zones, discuss and adjust them.
    These zones should appear on the map. The discussions should be available by a click.
    Only then we could consider the user as fully responsible.

    I tried to get in touch with Wikiloc per forum and per e-mail.
    Until now, silence.

  • Photo of Christian Holzl
    Christian Holzl Oct 8, 2017

    I have my answer!
    I got this message to a question I posted on the wikiloc Forum:

    From kaixi
    Hello,
    You can use waypoints to mark these areas.
    Thank you.

    So simple... let's do it!

  • Photo of Christian Holzl
  • Photo of ehajj
    ehajj Sep 24, 2019

    I have followed this trail  verified  View more

    Extreme hike

You can or this trail